Re: CoolBook

Post Preview

postName: Blacky
postWebsite: ''
postComment: "\"CoolBook is actually less efficient than Lion and should (for now) be avoided.\"\n\nI said so earlier, but it's possible that you get more performance with the \"kinda broken\" Coolbook than with Apple's default settings, so it might still be interesting for some. I had that in Starcraft 2: With Lions default settings I had like 2 fps with my 2010 Air under \"heavy\" load. With Coolbook the fps stayed at a playable rate (about 30 fps I guess) all the time. Lion probably reduces frequency a lot when overheating (which shouldnt happen under normal circumstances anyway). Battery is about the same with both, though. It's kinda ironic to use Coolbook to get extra performance and might not apply to anyone who doesn't play games."

rating: 0+x
This is the Redirect module that redirects the browser directly to the "" page.